A comparative analysis of the reduced major axis technique of fitting lines to bivariate data
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Vol. 17 (7) , 654-659
- https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-107
Abstract
There are many ways of estimating the parameters of an equation to represent the relationship between two variables. While least-squares regression is generally acknowledged to be the best method to use when estimating the conditional mean of one variable given a fixed value for another, it is not usually an appropriate method to use when your primary interest is in the values of the equation parameters themselves (functional relations). In this case there are many other techniques (Barlett''s three-group method, Schnute''s trend line, the general structural relationship, major axis regression, and reduced major axis) that may provide better estimates of these values. When all of the above techniques are compared, it is found that reduced major axis is often the most applicable because of its desirable properties and ease of estimation.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bivariate Linear Models in BiometrySystematic Zoology, 1977
- Tree structures: Deducing the principle of mechanical designJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1976
- Regression Lines and the Linear Functional RelationshipJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1947
- A.-G. GREENHILL. - Determination of the greatest height consistent with stability that a vertical pole or mast can be made, and of the greatest height to which a tree of given proportions can grow (Hauteur maxima compatible avec la stabilité d'une tige verticale ou d'un mât. Hauteur à laquelle peut croître un arbre de proportions connues); Proc. of Camb. phil. Soc., vol. IV, Part II, 1881Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée, 1882