Appropriate Use of the Glasgow Coma Scale in Intubated Patients
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Vol. 41 (3) , 514-522
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199609000-00022
Abstract
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been shown to be a valuable tool in assessing the neurologic and physiologic status of critically ill patients. Unfortunately, the GCS requires assessment of the verbal response of the patient and this can be blocked by intubation. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of a regression model based upon the eye and motor components of the GCS to accurately predict the verbal response of the GCS. The primary hypothesis was that the verbal response could be derived from the motor and eye responses of the GCS. Methods Data were collected prospectively in an intensive care unit computer data base. Patients were divided into training and test data sets. Linear regression was used to derive a model of verbal score from the motor and eye scores of the GCS in the training data set. Correlation between the actual and the predicted verbal scores was calculated. Results A total of 2,521 GCS assessments were available for analysis. The second order multiple regression model was an accurate predictor of the verbal score (Pearson's Correlation r =0.9, R2 = 0.8, p = 0.0001) in 1,463 observations in the training data set. Second Order Multiple Regression Model Estimated GCS Verbal = (2.3976) + [GCS Motor X (-0.9253)] + [GCS Eye X (-0.9214)] + [(GCS Motor) sup 2 X (0.2208)] + [(GCS Eye)2 X (0.2318)] where r = 0.91, R2 = 0.83, and p = 0.0001. The accuracy of this model was confirmed by comparing the predicted verbal score to the actual verbal score in the test data set (n = 736, r = 0.92, R2 = 0.85, p = 0.0001) Conclusions The GCS is a useful tool in the intensive care unit and a critical part of the APACHE II assessment of patient acuity. GCS has been shown to be a useful tool in its own right as a predictor of outcome in the critically ill. Its use is limited with intubation. (See Segatore M, Way C: Heart Lung 21:548, 1992; and Lieh-Lai MW, Theodorou AA, Sarnaik AP, et al: J Pediatr 120:195,1992.) The present study demonstrates that a relatively simple regression model can use the eye and motor components of the GCS to predict the expected verbal component of the GCS, thus allowing the calculation of the GCS sum score in intubated patients.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity ScorePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1989
- Comparison of Four Severity Scores in Patients with Head TraumaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1989
- Psychological consequences of blunt head trauma and relation to other indices of severity of injuryAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Predicting outcome from closed head injury by early assessment of trauma severityJournal of Neurosurgery, 1984
- The National Traumatic Coma Data BankJournal of Neurosurgery, 1983
- Predicting mortality of intensive care unit patients. The importance of comaCritical Care Medicine, 1982
- Trauma scoreCritical Care Medicine, 1981
- Early prediction of outcome in head-injured patientsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1981
- Measuring the outcome from head injuriesJournal of Neurosurgery, 1978
- ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESSThe Lancet, 1974