Larval development of Phoronis pallida (Phoronida): Implications for morphological convergence and divergence among larval body plans
- 4 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Morphology
- Vol. 259 (3) , 347-358
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10205
Abstract
Morphological variation among larval body plans must be placed into a phylogenetic and ecological context to assess whether similar morphologies are the result of phylogenetic constraints or convergent selective pressures. Investigations are needed of the diverse larval forms within the Lophotrochozoa, especially the larvae of phoronids and brachiopods. The actinotroch larva of Phoronis pallida (Phoronida) was reared in the laboratory to metamorphic competence. Larval development and growth were followed with video microscopy, SEM, and confocal microscopy. Early developmental features were similar to other phoronid species. Gastrulation was accomplished by embolic invagination of the vegetal hemisphere. Mesenchymal cells were found in the remaining blastocoelic space after invagination began. Mesenchymal cells formed the body wall musculature during the differentiation of larval features. Body wall musculature served as the framework from which all other larval muscles proliferated. Larval growth correlated best with developmental stage rather than age. Consistent with other phoronid species, differentiation of juvenile tissues occurred most rapidly at the latest stages of larval development. The minimum precompetency period of P. pallida was estimated to be ∼4–6 weeks. Previously published studies have documented that the planktonic embryos of P. pallida develop faster than the brooded embryos of P. vancouverensis. However, these data showed that the difference in developmental rate between the two species decreased in succeeding larval stages. There may be convergent selective pressures that result in similar timing to metamorphic competence among phoronid and brachiopod planktotrophic larval types. Morphological differences between these larval types result from heterochronic developmental shifts in the differentiation of juvenile tissue. Similarities in the larval morphology of phoronids and basal deuterostomes are likely the result of functional and developmental constraints rather than a shared (recent) evolutionary origin. These constraints are imposed by the functional design of embryological stages, feeding structures, and swimming structures. J. Morphol. 259:347–358, 2004.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cephalopod Hox genes and the origin of morphological noveltiesNature, 2003
- Gastrotricha and metazoan phylogenyZoologica Scripta, 2002
- The Phylogenetic Position of Entoprocta, Ectoprocta, Phoronida, and BrachiopodaIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 2002
- Chiton myogenesis: Perspectives for the development and evolution of larval and adult muscle systems in molluscsJournal of Morphology, 2001
- Ultrastructure and formation of the body cavity lining in Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida, Lophophorata)Zoomorphology, 2001
- The origin of the coelom in Brachiopoda and its phylogenetic significanceZoomorphology, 2000
- Monophyly of brachiopods and phoronids: reconciliation of molecular evidence with Linnaean classification (the subphylum Phoroniformea nov.)Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- Functional morphology of musculature in the acoelomate worm, Convoluta pulchra (Plathelminthes)Zoomorphology, 1999
- Molecular phylogeny of brachiopods and phoronids based on nuclear–encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequencesPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Ciliary Feeding Assisted by Suction From the Muscular Oral Hood of Phoronid LarvaeThe Biological Bulletin, 1997