Commentary: The value of close surveillance after lung cancer surgery: How absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• Commentary: Robotic anatomic lung resection: Raising the bar of our expectations in treating lung cancer
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2019
• Imaging surveillance for surgically resected stage I non–small cell lung cancer: Is more always better?
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018
• More Frequent Surveillance Following Lung Cancer Resection Is Not Associated With Improved Survival
  Annals of Surgery, 2018
• Risk Stratification for Second Primary Lung Cancer
  Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
• Impact of age and comorbidity on treatment of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence following complete resection: A nationally representative cohort study
  Lung Cancer, 2016
• Does the method of radiologic surveillance affect survival after resection of stage I non–small cell lung cancer?
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014
• Patterns of recurrence and second primary lung cancer in early-stage lung cancer survivors followed with routine computed tomography surveillance
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012
• Survival Benefits from Follow-Up of Patients with Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2011
• The National Lung Screening Trial: Overview and Study Design
  Radiology, 2011
• Integrated FDG-PET/CT vs. standard radiological examinations: Comparison of capability for assessment of postoperative recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer patients
  European Journal of Radiology, 2010