Guidelines 2000 for Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 April 2001
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 93 (8) , 583-596
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.8.583
Abstract
Background: Oncologic resection techniques affect outcome for colon cancer and rectal cancer, but standardized guidelines have not been adopted. The National Cancer Institute sponsored a panel of experts to systematically review current literature and to draft guidelines that provide uniform definitions, principles, and practices. Methods: Methods were similar to those described by the American Society of Clinical Oncology in developing practice guidelines. Experts representing oncology and surgery met to review current literature on oncologic resection techniques for level of evidence (I–V, where I is the best evidence and V is the least compelling) and grade of recommendation (A–D, where A is based on the best evidence and D is based on the weakest evidence). Initial guidelines were drafted, reviewed, and accepted by consensus. Results: For the following seven factors, the level of evidence was II, III, or IV, and the findings were generally consistent (grade B): anatomic definition of colon versus rectum, tumor–node–metastasis staging, radial margins, adjuvant R0 stage, inadvertent rectal perforation, distal and proximal rectal margins, and en bloc resection of adherent tumors. For another seven factors, the level of evidence was II, III, or IV, but findings were inconsistent (grade C): laparoscopic colectomy; colon lymphadenectomy; level of proximal vessel ligation, mesorectal excision, and extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (all three for rectal cancer); no-touch technique; and bowel washout. For the other four factors, there was little or no systematic empirical evidence (grade D): abdominal exploration, oophorectomy, extent of colon resection, and total length of rectum resected. Conclusions: The panel reports surgical guidelines and definitions based on the best available evidence. The availability of more standardized information in the future should allow for more grade A recommendations.Keywords
This publication has 107 references indexed in Scilit:
- Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomySurgical Endoscopy, 1998
- Rectal CancerArchives of Surgery, 1998
- Distal intramural spread in adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum treated with total rectal resection and coloanal anastomosisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1997
- Laparoscopic-assisted colectomySurgical Endoscopy, 1995
- Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colonDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1993
- Significance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1989
- The Will Rogers PhenomenonNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Results of extended surgery for cancer of the rectum and sigmoidBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectumCancer, 1980