Improved survival in esophageal cancer in the period 1978 to 1983.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The outcome of therapy of adenocarcinomas and squamous-cell carcinomas of the esophagus is so poor that the results of new approaches to therapy, such as the addition of radiotherapy or chemotherapy, are often compared with those achieved in historical controls. To determine the validity of this approach in cancers with a poor outcome, the results of therapy were analyzed at out institution from Jan 11, 1978 to Aug 9, 1981 (77 patients) and compared with the results achieved in the period from Aug 14, 1981 to Feb 19, 1984 (77 patients). The patients were evenly matched for prognostic factors. It was found that the median survival of the first group of patients (4 months) was significantly less (P < .01) than that of the recently treated group (10 months). This was due to the better median survival of patients treated surgically from 4 months in the early group to 29 months at present (P < .01). There was no change in the survival of the other patients. The major improvement in the outcome of surgery was due to the reduction of the perioperative mortality rate to < 5%. There was no detectable change in patient selection for surgery. The results indicate that even in tumors with a very poor outcome, such as esophageal cancer, large changes in results can occur without a specific change in therapy, and that historical controls may be misleading.