Mechanochemical tumescentless endovenous ablation: final results of the initial clinical trial
Open Access
- 29 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease
- Vol. 27 (2) , 67-72
- https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2011.010100
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the ClariVein® system that employs mechanochemical ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV). Method: Patients eligible for ablation of the GSV underwent micropuncture access with only local anaesthesia to insert a 4 or 5 Fr sheath. The ClariVein® catheter was placed through the sheath, the wire was extruded, and the distal tip of the wire positioned 2 cm from the saphenofemoral junction under ultrasound guidance. Catheter wire rotation was then activated for 2–3 seconds at approximately 3500 rpm. With the wire rotating, infusion of the sclerosant was started simultaneously with catheter pullback. The sclerosant used was 1.5% liquid sodium tetradecyl sulphate (Sotradecol©, Bioniche Pharma Group, Geneva, Switzerland). Results: Thirty GSVs in 29 patients were treated. All patients have reached six-month follow-up; the average number of postoperative days is 260. No adverse events have been reported. The Primary Closure Rate is 96.7%. Conclusion: Mechanochemical ablation appears to be safe and efficacious. The ClariVein® technique eliminates the need for tumescent anaesthesia. The great majority of incompetent GSVs can be treated with this technique.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pain Management in Peripheral Arterial Obstructive Disease: Oral Slow-Release Oxycodone Versus Epidural l-BupivacaineEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2010
- Ultrasound-Guided Sclerotherapy of the Great Saphenous Vein with 1% vs. 3% Polidocanol Foam: A Multicentre Double-Blind Randomised Trial with 3-Year Follow-UpEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2010
- Radiofrequency Endovenous ClosureFAST versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Reflux: A Multicenter, Single-blinded, Randomized Study (RECOVERY Study)Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009
- Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: First clinical experienceJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2008
- Comparison of 1% and 3% Polidocanol Foam in Ultrasound Guided Sclerotherapy of the Great Saphenous Vein: A Randomised, Double-Blind Trial with 2 Year-Follow-up. “The 3/1 Study”European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2007
- Outcomes and Side effects of Duplex-Guided Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins with 1% versus 3% Polidocanol Foam: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-UpDermatologic Surgery, 2007
- Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statementJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2004
- Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: A multicenter studyJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2002
- Ipsilateral femoral vein compression: A contraindication to thrombin injection of femoral pseudoaneurysmsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2002
- Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessmentJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2000