Authoritarianism and Sentencing Strategies for Low and High Severity Crimes

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study focused on differences in the penal philosophies of high and low authoritarian subjects in sentencing offenders who had committed low or high severity crimes. Contrary to a major prediction based on Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswick, Levinson, and Sanford's psychodynamic theory of the authoritarian personality, the data indicated that high authoritarians relied more heavily on harsher sentencing strategies like general and specific deterrence than low authoritarians, but only when judging offenders who had committed high severity crimes such as murder, rape, and manslaughter. For the most part, high and low authoritarians did not differ when judging lawbreakers who committed low severity crimes such as shoplifting, car theft, and forgery. Discussion focused on the deficiencies inherent in traditional psychodynamic theories which limit their predictive utility.

This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit: