The use of the simple present in the speech of two three-year-olds: Normativity not subjectivity
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language in Society
- Vol. 15 (4) , 501-535
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500011994
Abstract
In our research, we wish to illuminate different types of discursive intentions which are structured into discourse via the verb inflections and auxiliaries, together with their entailed social effects. In the present report, we examine the use of the simple present by two three-year-olds, and argue that analyses in terms of tense or aspect are not adequate to account for its use. One needs to recognize the way in which the form implicitly refers to norms and thereby entails a type of impersonal motivation – especially as it is just this feature of the use of this form that structures the ongoing activity into a nondialogic, normative activity. (Simple present, normativity, subjectivity, activity-types, nondialogic discourse, the constitutive role of language, American English)Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- IntentionalityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983
- Transitivity in Grammar and DiscourseLanguage, 1980
- Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child languageLanguage, 1980
- Aspect and Foregrounding in DiscoursePublished by Brill ,1979
- Expression and MeaningPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1979
- At morning it's lunchtime: A scriptal view of children's dialogues∗Discourse Processes, 1979
- How children talk about what happenedJournal of Child Language, 1976
- Time, tense and aspectCognition, 1973
- Reference and Definite DescriptionsThe Philosophical Review, 1966
- The Use of the Progressive Form in English: A New ApproachLanguage, 1951