EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS AND THE REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 74 (1) , 127-146
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127
Abstract
Where do equivalence relations come from? One possible answer is that they arise directly from the reinforcement contingency. That is to say, a reinforcement contingency produces two types of outcome: (a) 2‐, 3‐, 4‐, 5‐, or n‐term units of analysis that are known, respectively, as operant reinforcement, simple discrimination, conditional discrimination, second‐order conditional discrimination, and so on; and (b) equivalence relations that consist of ordered pairs of all positive elements that participate in the contingency. This conception of the origin of equivalence relations leads to a number of new and verifiable ways of conceptualizing equivalence relations and, more generally, the stimulus control of operant behavior. The theory is also capable of experimental disproof.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Animals Classify Friends and FoesCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2000
- A DISCRIMINATION ANALYSIS OF TRAINING‐STRUCTURE EFFECTS ON STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE OUTCOMESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1999
- Symbolic representation in animals: Emergent stimulus relations in conditional discrimination learningLearning & Behavior, 1998
- VISUAL IDENTITY MATCHING AND AUDITORY-VISUAL MATCHING: A PROCEDURAL NOTEJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1998
- Functional equivalence in a California sea lion: relevance to animal social and communicative interactionsAnimal Behaviour, 1998
- DIFFERENTIAL VOCALIZATION IN BUDGERIGARS: TOWARDS AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF NAMINGJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1995
- Stimulus class formation and functional equivalence in moderately retarded individuals' conditional discriminationBehavioural Processes, 1988
- STIMULUS CLASS MEMBERSHIP ESTABLISHED VIA STIMULUS—REINFORCER RELATIONSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1987
- EQUIVALENCE CLASS FORMATION IN LANGUAGE‐ABLE AND LANGUAGE‐DISABLED CHILDRENJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1986
- Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different?Learning and Motivation, 1970