DETERRENCE Theory versus Practice
- 1 May 1978
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology
- Vol. 16 (1) , 3-22
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1978.tb01394.x
Abstract
Recently, some researchers have attempted to resurrect deterrence theory. These researchers have focused on the relationship between certainty and severity of punishment and subsequent rates of crime. An inverse relationship has been found, leading these researchers to conclude that penal sanctions deter crime. This paper presents another hypothesis, namely, that increases in crime may overburden existing legal machinery, and thus cause decreases in the certainty of punishment as a result. Using the same data employed in past deterrence studies, this paper demonstrates that crime may affect certainty of punishment more strongly than certainty of punishment affects the crime rate, a finding which seriously questions the ability of legal threats as currently administered in American society to deter crime.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sanctions and Deviance: Evidence and Remaining QuestionsLaw & Society Review, 1973
- General Deterrent Effects of ImprisonmentSocial Forces, 1972
- General Deterrent Effects of ImprisonmentSocial Forces, 1972
- A Note on the Partial Correlation CoefficientThe American Statistician, 1971
- Punishment and Crime: An Examination of Some Empirical EvidenceSocial Problems, 1970
- Crime Rates and Legal SanctionsSocial Problems, 1969
- Observations on the Measurement of ChangeSociological Methodology, 1969
- The General Preventive Effects of PunishmentUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1966
- Detecting Causal Priorities in Panel Study DataAmerican Sociological Review, 1964
- General Prevention. Illusion or Reality?The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1952