Perioperative factors influencing patient outcome after liver transplantation
Open Access
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Transplant International
- Vol. 13 (S1) , S158-S161
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2000.tb02010.x
Abstract
We have previously shown that the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) after liver transplantation significantly reduced patient survival. Therefore, the question arises of which are the most prominent perioperative donor and recipient factors leading to MODS after transplantation. In total, 634 patients with 700 liver transplants were analyzed. Donor factors included age, increase in transaminases, sex mismatch, requirement for catecholamines, intensive care time, histology, and macroscopic graft appearence. Recipient factors included Child classification, preoperative gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and requirement for catecholamines. MODS was defined by more than two severe organ dysfunctions. The cumulative 2 to 9‐year patient survival was 90.9 % in patients developing less than 3 severe organ dysfunctions following transplantation. Survival decreased to 60.3 % in patients with MODS. Neither any of the donor factors nor the duration of cold ischemia (CIT) was associated with an increase in MODS or decrease in survival. On the other hand, duration of warm ischemia, amount of blood loss, requirement for red packed blood cells, and reoperation had an influence on the development of MODS (40%‐56%) and decreased patient survival to 58%‐69%. Preoperative therapy with catecholamines, GI bleeding, mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis were associated with the development of MODS in 54 %‐88 %. Patient survival following MODS decreased to 50%‐74%. Initial graft function had a slight influence on the development of MODS, but no influence on the long‐term patient survival. In conclusion, patient survival was significantly influenced by the development of postoperative MODS. The most prominent factors in this were recipient and intraoperative ones. No major influence was observed for donor factors, CIT, and initial graft function. Prevention of MODS will further improve the outcome after liver transplantation.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Initial Graft Function Influence the Outcome After Liver Transplantation?Transplantation Proceedings, 1998
- Influence of warm ischemia time on initial graft function in human liver transplantationTransplantation Proceedings, 1997
- THE RELEASE OF CYTOKINES, ADHESION MOLECULES, AND EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PARAMETERS DURING AND AFTER REPERFUSION IN HUMAN LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1996
- Reperfusion injury to donor livers stored for transplantationLiver Transplantation and Surgery, 1995
- COMPARISON OF FK506- AND CYCLOSPORINE-BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN PRIMARY ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1995
- RISK FACTORS FOR PRIMARY DYSFUNCTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION—A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSISTransplantation, 1993
- EFFECT OF COLD ISCHEMIA TIME ON THE EARLY OUTCOME OF HUMAN HEPATIC ALLOGRAFTS PRESERVED WITH UW SOLUTIONTransplantation, 1991
- THE INFLUENCE OF PRESERVATION INJURY ON REJECTION IN THE HEPATIC TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTTransplantation, 1990
- Multiple-Organ FailureArchives of Surgery, 1985