Quality Control, Quality Assurance, and Proficiency Testing in the Andrology Laboratory
Open Access
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Archives of Andrology
- Vol. 48 (6) , 417-431
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01485010290099147
Abstract
The primary goal of any andrology laboratory should be the performance of accurate, reproducible, high-quality, and clinically relevant laboratory testing. An underlining objective of such a goal is to better serve the ordering physician, and the patient, by continually improving laboratory performance. Quality control (QC) is the procedure that determines accurate and reproducible testing. Proficiency testing (PT) is the process allowing physicians to compare results from one laboratory to another. Quality assurance (QA) is the mechanism ensuring high-quality, clinically relevant testing. Together, QC, QA, and PT serve as the foundation responsible for a program that continually improves the overall quality of the testing, allowing the physician ordering the test to be more effective in treating the patient. Several examples are presented to assist the implementation of effective QC and QA programs aimed at continually improving performance in the andrology laboratory.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrologyHuman Reproduction, 2000
- Assessment of interlaboratory and intralaboratory sperm morphology readings with the use of a Hamilton Thorne Research integrated visual optical system semen analyzerFertility and Sterility, 1999
- Sperm morphology assessment: historical review in relation to fertilityHuman Reproduction Update, 1995
- Semen Evaluations in the Clinical Laboratory:How Well Are They Being Performed?Laboratory Medicine, 1994
- Differences in the Quality of Semen in Outdoor Workers during Summer and WinterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Quality Control During the Conventional Analysis of Semen, An Essential ExerciseJournal of Andrology, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Errors Inherent in the Performance of a Routine Semen AnalysisBritish Journal of Urology, 1983
- The Neglected Laboratory Test The Semen AnalysisJournal of Andrology, 1983
- When and How to Use Cu-Sum ChartsTechnometrics, 1963