PREDICTING SATURATED AND UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN UNDISTURBED SOILS FROM SOIL WATER CHARACTERISTICS
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Soil Science
- Vol. 164 (12) , 877-887
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199912000-00001
Abstract
Hydraulic conductivity is likely the most important soil property controlling water and solute movement in soils. It is also one of the most variable and uncertain soil properties. Models for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity from other soil characteristics are, therefore, useful in both deterministic and stochastic transport studies. A new model for predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity (KS) in undisturbed soils from macroporosity (∊100), defined as the air-filled porosity at a soil-water potential of Ψ = −100 cm H2O, was developed using data for 23 undisturbed soils (90 horizons). The new KS model compared well with measurements when tested against independent data sets for 73 undisturbed soils (191 horizons) from the UNSODA database and gave improved predictions (accuracy within one order of magnitude) compared with existing KS models. Two new models for predicting relative hydraulic conductivity (K/KS) in relatively moist, (Ψ > −350 cm H2O) undisturbed soils from soil-water content (θ) and the Campbell soil-water retention parameter, b, were developed using conductivity and water retention data for the 73 soils from UNSODA. The new K/KS models represent modifications of the recently presented DLC and SLC models (Poulsen et al. 1998. Soil Science 163:425-435 ) for predicting K/KS in sieved, repacked soils. The modified DLC and SLC models were combined with the new KS model, yielding new two-parameter (∊100, b) models for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (K(θ)) in undisturbed soil. The two new K(θ) models were successfully tested against independent K(θ) data. Also, the classical Campbell (Campbell. 1974. Soil Science 117:311-314 ) K/KS model, combined with the new, more accurate KS model, gave K(θ) prediction accuracy almost as good as the modified DLC and SLC K(θ) models. The suggested two-parameter K(θ) models require knowledge of only the soil-water retention curve, including a measurement at Ψ = −100 cm H2O, and seem promising for use in deterministic and stochastic models for water transport in natural, undisturbed soils.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Soil-Water and Soil-Air Transport Properties and Their Effects on Soil-Vapor Extraction EfficiencyGround Water Monitoring & Remediation, 1999
- MODELING DIFFUSION AND REACTION IN SOILS: VIII. GAS DIFFUSION PREDICTED FROM SINGLE-POTENTIAL DIFFUSIVITY OR PERMEABILTY MEASUREMENTSSoil Science, 1999
- Closed‐Form Expressions for Water Retention and Conductivity DataGroundwater, 1997
- Lognormal Distribution Model for Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic PropertiesWater Resources Research, 1996
- Reevaluation of the Evaporation Method for Determining Hydraulic Functions in Unsaturated SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1993
- Simulation of solute leaching in soils of differing permeabilitiesSoil Use and Management, 1991
- A new laboratory method to quickly determine the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of undisturbed soil cores within a wide range of texturesJournal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 1990
- A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1980
- Formation Factor and Permeability EquationsNature, 1964
- SOME STEADY-STATE SOLUTIONS OF THE UNSATURATED MOISTURE FLOW EQUATION WITH APPLICATION TO EVAPORATION FROM A WATER TABLESoil Science, 1958