CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease
- 21 December 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 110 (25) , 3753-3759
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000149077.87074.de
Abstract
There is great interest in moving beyond established risk factors to consider markers of inflammation for the prediction of initial cardiovascular disease events. Inflammatory markers such as leukocyte count, serum amyloid A, C-reactive protein, and vascular outcomes in individuals free of cardiovascular disease at baseline are the key markers that have been investigated in the population setting. A meta-analysis of 11 prospective studies in asymptomatic individuals compared people in the bottom third of the C-reactive protein distribution with those in the top tertile. The authors reported an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.5) for coronary heart disease among people in the top tertile. These results are among the strongest assembled thus far to recommend incorporating newer biomarkers into coronary heart disease risk estimation algorithms. A variety of issues should be considered and conditions satisfied before vascular disease risk factors are adopted into regular use. The type of vascular event and the follow-up interval are important features because results for short-, intermediate-, and long-term intervals may yield different results. The factors under consideration should have been standardized, and characteristics such as the variability of the measurements, correlations with established factors, evidence from observational studies and clinical trials, type of effect (linear, nonlinear, dichotomous), improvement in overall prediction (discrimination), generalization of results (calibration), and cost can affect the utility. Each of these issues needs to be considered and the effects on relative, absolute, and population-attributable risks described. In particular, we need to (1) develop sound strategies for implementing new testing and (2) demonstrate the benefit of testing by using the current foundation of prior probabilities developed from already-published risk factor assessments based on large population studies.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Task force #4—how do we select patients for atherosclerosis imaging?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Comparison of C-Reactive Protein and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in the Prediction of First Cardiovascular EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Plasma Homocysteine as a Risk Factor for Dementia and Alzheimer's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- C-Reactive Protein and Other Markers of Inflammation in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease in WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Risk factors for coronary heart disease and acute-phase proteins. A population-based studyEuropean Heart Journal, 1999
- The Effect of Folic Acid Fortification on Plasma Folate and Total Homocysteine ConcentrationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Inflammation, Aspirin, and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Apparently Healthy MenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Hemostatic Factors and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction or Sudden Death in Patients with Angina PectorisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Endogenous tissue-type plasminogen activator and risk of myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1993
- The Pathogenesis of Coronary Artery Disease and the Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992