Conventional Abdominal Radiography as a Means to Rule Out Ileo-Caecal Intussusception
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acta Radiologica. Diagnosis
- Vol. 25 (4) , 265-267
- https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518402500403
Abstract
The experiences gained with conventional radiographic examinations as a means of excluding childhood ileo-caecal intussusception are presented. According to these, a supplementary barium enema is indicated a) in patients under 6 months of age, b) in patients presenting with scant intestinal gas, c) in patients where the caecum cannot be outlined, d) in patients with a possible mass lesion of the colon, e) in patients with obstruction presumably due to intussusception, and f) in patients with discrepancy between the clinical and radiologic findings (1, 4). In all other patients the barium examination is not used. The key to a successful application of this protocol is a thorough familiarity with the limitations and potentials of the conventional abdominal examination.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blunt abdominal trauma and hollow viscus injury in children: the diagnostic value of plain radiographyPediatric Radiology, 1984
- Barium peritonitis. Experience of five pediatric casesPediatric Radiology, 1983
- Intussusception--the forgotten postoperative obstruction.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1982
- Intussusception: additional observations on the plain radiographAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Atypical ileocolic intussusception diagnosed by barium follow-throughPediatric Radiology, 1982
- Perforation of the intussuscepted colonAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1981
- Large bowel volvulus in childrenPediatric Radiology, 1981
- Reliability of the abdominal plain film diagnosis in pediatric patients with suspected intussusceptionPediatric Radiology, 1980
- The painless intussusceptionJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1976