Lack of Response byTilapia niloticato Mass Selection for Rapid Early Growth
- 1 May 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Vol. 117 (3) , 297-300
- https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1988)117<0297:lorbnt>2.3.co;2
Abstract
Mass selection for rapid and slow early growth was applied for one generation to 58-d-old Nile tilapia Tilapia nilotica (Ivory Coast strain). Realized heritability (±SE) for rapid growth was –0.10 ± 0.02, and mean body weight of progeny was not different (P > 0.05) from that of control fish. This confirms an earlier prediction from half-sib analysis of the same stock that selection for rapid growth would be ineffective for these fish (half-sib heritabilities were 0.04 ± 0.14 at age 45 d and 0.04 ± 0.06 at age 90 d). In contrast, selection for slow early growth resulted in realized heritability of 0.36 ± 0.08, and mean body weight of progeny was less than that of control fish (P < 0.05). Our study indicated that an upper limit to growth enhancement by selection exists in this stock of T. nilotica, probably due to a small founder stock, subsequent reductions in effective breeding numbers, and 8 years of domestication. We conclude that half-sib analysis can be an efficient means for estimating the e...This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicted Response to Selection for Early Growth in Tilapia niloticaTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1980
- Three Generations of Selection for Growth Rate in Fall-Spawning Rainbow TroutTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1977
- Genetic Differences in Growth and Survival of Juvenile Hatchery and Wild Steelhead Trout, Salmo gairdneriJournal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1977
- The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse II. The Genetic Nature of the LimitsGenetics Research, 1966
- 177. Note: The Error Variance of the Heritability Estimate Obtained from Selection ResponseBiometrics, 1962