A new questionnaire for constipation and faecal incontinence
- 14 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 20 (3) , 355-364
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02028.x
Abstract
The prevalence, severity and risk factors of faecal incontinence in women in the community are incompletely characterized. To develop and validate a self-report questionnaire (faecal incontinence and constipation assessment) to address these issues. Eighty-three women completed the instrument; 20 randomly selected patients answered the faecal incontinence and constipation assessment again 6 weeks later. A gastroenterologist also completed the faecal incontinence and constipation assessment in all 83 subjects after a detailed clinical assessment. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing the patient's self-report to a doctor interview for every question. Reproducibility was evaluated by a test-retest approach for every question. The severity of faecal incontinence was rated by incorporating the frequency and type of faecal incontinence, rectal urgency and use of sanitary devices. The questionnaire was well-understood. Reproducibility [median kappa statistic, 0.80 (interquartile range: 0.66-0.90)]; and concurrent validity [0.59 (0.47-0.67)] were acceptable. For the index question on faecal incontinence, the kappa for reproducibility and concurrent validity was 0.90 and 0.95, respectively. The faecal incontinence severity score was also valid (kappa = 0.5). The faecal incontinence and constipation assessment has excellent reproducibility and reasonable validity for assessing the presence, risk factors and severity of faecal incontinence and associated bowel disorders in women when compared against clinical assessment.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of a questionnaire to assess fecal incontinence and associated risk factorsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000
- Fecal incontinence quality of life scaleDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000
- Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinenceDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999
- A New Questionnaire for Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1994
- Discriminant value of psychological distress, symptom profiles, and segmental colonic dysfunction in outpatients with severe idiopathic constipation.Gut, 1994
- U. S. Householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disordersDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1993
- High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- FAECAL INCONTINENCE: THE UNVOICED SYMPTOMThe Lancet, 1982