Choosing Sample Sizes to Maximize Expected Health Benefits Subject to a Constraint on Total Trial Costs
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 9 (1) , 14-25
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x8900900104
Abstract
The authors present a method for choosing sample sizes for randomized controlled trials that maximizes expected health benefits (measured in expected discounted life years gained) subject to the decision maker's budget constraint. In comparison with similar approaches, the method introduces richer and more realistic models for the following quantities: costs and benefits during and after the trial, rates of adopting interventions after a positive rec ommendation, the distribution of data collected in the trial, and the decision to make a positive recommendation based on the results of the trial. Although the methodology is applicable to any type of trial, the emphasis in the paper is on prevention trials. Calculations involve Monte Carlo methods. An example is provided.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Designing clinical trials with arbitrary specification of survival functions and for the log rank or generalized Wilcoxon testControlled Clinical Trials, 1987
- Using economic analysis to determine the resource consequences of choices made in planning clinical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Summing UpPublished by Harvard University Press ,1984
- Sequential comparison of two exponential distributions with censored survival dataBiometrika, 1981
- Covariance Analysis of Censored Survival Data Using Log-Linear Analysis TechniquesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1981
- Sequential analysis of comparative clinical trialsBiometrika, 1978
- An Extension of Colton's Model for Comparing Two Medical TreatmentsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978