Reduced Exposure to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 357 (25) , 2562-2575
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067411
Abstract
Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens. We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. The primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft–Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival. The mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%). A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764.)Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial dataBMJ, 2005
- Calcineurin Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity: Longitudinal Assessment by Protocol HistologyTransplantation, 2004
- Cyclosporine nephrotoxicitySeminars in Nephrology, 2003
- Hypertensinogenic mechanism of the calcineurin inhibitorsCurrent Hypertension Reports, 2002
- Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin microemulsion in renal transplantation: a randomised multicentre studyThe Lancet, 2002
- Strategies to Improve Long-Term Outcomes after Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A large, multicentre trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with cyclosporine microemulsion following renal transplantationTransplantation Proceedings, 2001
- HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN SOLID ORGAN TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1997
- Hypertension Following Kidney TransplantationAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1994
- Mechanism of Cyclosporine-Induced HypertensionAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 1991