Measuring central bank independence: a tale of subjectivity and of its consequences

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The paper first scrutinises the two indices of central bank independence (CBI) most commonly used in the empirical literature. It defines and discovers an impressive interpretation spread, a major criteria spread but a negligible weighting spread in those indices Second, it framing the robustness of the empirical ‘common knowledge’ on the benefits of CBI. It finds that, when rankings produced by various CBI indices are regressed with, among others, average inflation, 87 5% of die regression coefficients are not statistically significant Third, following recent theoretical developments, it suggests an alternative approach to the measurement of a central bank's operational status.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: