The Relation between Methods of Graphing Student Performance Data and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Special Education Technology
- Vol. 8 (3) , 5-13
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016264348700800302
Abstract
This meta-analysis investigated the effects on achievement of type of graphing paper employed in displaying student performance data collected over time. The data source was 15 controlled studies with 16 effect sizes. The average weighted unbiased effect sizes for 6-cycle and equal interval paper, respectively, were .53 and .46. Hedges's analogue to analysis of variance indicated this difference was not statistically reliable. Implications for special education practice are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Systematic Formative Evaluation: A Meta-AnalysisExceptional Children, 1986
- Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging AlternativeExceptional Children, 1985
- The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of LearningAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1984
- Effects of Coaching Programs on Achievement Test PerformanceReview of Educational Research, 1983
- Code of Ethics and Standards for Professional PracticeExceptional Children, 1983
- Research in Reading and Learning Style: Implications for Exceptional ChildrenExceptional Children, 1983
- Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related EstimatorsJournal of Educational Statistics, 1981
- Differential Diagnosis—Prescriptive Teaching: A Critical AppraisalReview of Educational Research, 1979
- Examining the Benefits and Prevalence of Modality Considerations in Special EducationThe Journal of Special Education, 1977
- The Effectiveness of Psycholinguistic TrainingExceptional Children, 1974