Corporate Pluralism in Danish Law‐Making*

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article investigates the pattern of corporate political representation in Danish law‐making. The most important finding is a large intra‐system variation in scope, level, and structure of outside involvement. There is no evidence of an emerging ‘total’ system of corporate political representation. The dominant pattern is still one of a diversified use of several channels of access by a large variety of groups, organizations, and institutions. While the importance of organized interests is well documented, it is questionable to what extent this indicates a pattern of societal corporatism in the political system. Interest organizations play an important role in pluralist societies as well, and Philippe Schmitter's main point about representational monopoly does not gain support. Generally, the analysis tends to support a model of pluralist corporate representation.

This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit: