Improving the quality of health care: Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care
- 19 April 2003
- Vol. 326 (7394) , 877-879
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7394.877
Abstract
This is the third of three articles on research into improving the quality of health care Efforts to improve health care will be wasted unless they reflect what patients want from the service. But to be sure that surveys of patients' views are valid and have an effect on care, the methods used must be evaluated rigorously Society now acknowledges the importance of the views of users in developing services, and the healthcare sector has used a range of methods to identify the views of patients and the public. Examples are questionnaires to assess patients' needs before a consultation with the clinician, shared decision making, focus groups with patients to include their views in clinical guidelines, and surveys among patients to provide feedback to care providers or the public. Such methods need to be examined in terms of validity, effectiveness, and implementation.1 We describe some of the important issues related to measuring patients' views and evaluating their use in improving health care. #### Summary points Patients can contribute to debates on health care by giving their preferences for care, evaluations of what occurred, or factual reports of care Measures of patients' views should be assessed for validity, preferably by rigorous qualitative studies Methods to include patients' views must be shown to affect the processes and outcomes of health care; possible negative consequences should also be considered The methods used to determine patients' views can be divided into three types: measures of preferences, evaluations by users, and reports of health care (box). The types of measure used will depend on what aspect of health care is being assessed, but all have limitations. One problem with assessing preferences is that patients' decisions about what is important in health care often reflect their individual experience rather than a general view. Interaction between patients in focus …Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consumers’ views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to ‘shared decision‐making’ approachesHealth Expectations, 2001
- Implementation Barriers for General Practice Guidelines on Low Back PainSpine, 2001
- Evidence-based patient empowermentQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2000
- Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting valuesHealth Expectations, 1999
- Patient satisfaction: A valid concept?Social Science & Medicine, 1994
- Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: A literature analysisSocial Science & Medicine, 1994
- Patients as Reliable Reporters of Medical Care ProcessMedical Care, 1992
- Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—I: Measurement strategiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Patient Requests and ExpectationsMedical Care, 1984
- Patient satisfaction in primary health care: A literature review and analysisEvaluation and Program Planning, 1983