Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopy‐assisted Colectomy versusLaparotomy with Resection for Management of Complex Polyps of theSigmoid Colon

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy istechnically feasible, but objective evidence of its benefits remainsscarce. This study was done to evaluate the outcomes and operativestress of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus the traditional openmethod in the management of sigmoid complex polyps that cannot besafely or adequately removed by colonofibroscopy. Between January 1997and December 1999, a total of 42 patients were equally randomizedto the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group by the blockedrandomization method. Three patients randomized to the laparoscopygroup did not complete the trial; therefore 18 patients treated bylaparoscopy-assisted sigmoidectomy and the other 21 treated by the openmethod were prospectively evaluated. These two groups of patients werewell matched in age, gender, symptoms, tumor location, localizationmethod, tumor size, morphology, histopathology, and the accuracy of theclinical diagnosis. Two standardized surgical strategies, thelateral-to-medial and medial-to-lateral dissection sequences, wereperformed in 14 and 4 patients of the laparoscopy group, respectively,according to whether their tumors were located above or below 20 cmabove the anal verge. After evaluating the surgical outcomes, we foundthat the laparoscopy group was significantly better than the laparotomygroup in regard to parameters that included severity of postoperativepain, wound size, postoperative complication rate, and the duration ofpostoperative ileus, hospitalization, and disability. There was nosignificant difference in the operating times for these two groups.However, the costs of the laparoscopy group were significantly higher.To evaluate the surgical stress, we measured the serum C-reactiveprotein (CRP) level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), totallymphocyte count, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio 24 hoursbefore and after surgery. We found that the postoperative serum CRPlevel and the ESR were significantly less elevated and the totallymphocyte counts and CD4+/CD8+ ratio weresignificantly less depressed in the laparoscopy group than in thelaparotomy group. We thus concluded that laparoscopy-assistedsigmoidectomy can be safely performed with shorter convalescence andless operative stress but at a higher cost. We strongly recommended theuse of this technique in the management of sigmoid complex polyps ifthe patient's economic status permits.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: