Methodological standards for assessing therapeutic equivalence
- 31 December 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 44 (8) , 839-849
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90139-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aortic Valvuloplasty — A Valid Alternative?New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Hospital Discharge Three Days after Myocardial Infarction in the Era of ReperfusionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Measures of and tests for net improvement in clinical trials, PhDControlled Clinical Trials, 1988
- Establishing therapeutic equivalency. What is a clinically significant difference?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1986
- Absence of Therapeutic Benefit from Antacids or Cimetidine in Non-Ulcer DyspepsiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Sample size graphs for “proving the null hypothesis”Controlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- Determining the probability of an important difference in bioavailabilityClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1980
- Null results in clinical trials: the need for a decision-theory approachBritish Journal of Cancer, 1980
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse PractitionerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974