Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 79 (4) , 1061-1078
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1956248
Abstract
This article shows that citizens can estimate what politically strategic groups—liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, and blacks and whites—stand for on major issues. These attitude attributions follow from a simple calculus, a likability heuristic. This heuristic is rooted in people's likes and dislikes of political groups. Thanks to this affective calculus, many in the mass public are able to estimate who stands for what politically, notwithstanding shortfalls in information and information processing.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Policy Reasoning and Political Values: The Problem of Racial EqualityAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1984
- Subjective agreement with the presidential candidates of 1976 and 1980.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Membership group, reference group, and the attribution of attitudes to groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981
- Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the VoteAmerican Political Science Review, 1979
- Ideological Interpretations of Presidential ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1979
- Political person perception: The asymmetrical influence of sentiment and choice on perceptions of presidential candidates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Elections and Social Choice: The State of the EvidenceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1977
- A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1977
- Intriligator, Michael D., Mathematical Optimization and Economic Theory, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice‐Hall, Inc., 1971, xix + 508 pp. ($13.95 )American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1972
- Theory and Methods of ScalingBritish Journal of Sociology, 1961