Controlling Research Trials
- 3 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 348 (14) , 1377-1380
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme030031
Abstract
Clinical research, especially in the form of large multicenter trials, promotes changes in practice; without the accrual of new knowledge, clinical care will not advance. A deadlock between the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) of the Department of Health and Human Services about the ethics of a clinical trial has the potential to bring much clinical research to a halt. The trial in question is designed to examine the ability of intravenous-fluid management directed by physiological data obtained from a pulmonary-artery catheter to influence outcomes in medical intensive care units. . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Therapeutic Orientation to Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Research Involving Cognitively Impaired AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The Integral Role of Clinical Research in Clinical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- How Best to Ventilate? Trial Design and Patient Safety in Studies of the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Meta-Analysis of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trials Testing Low Tidal VolumesAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Time, Place, and Consciousness: Three Dimensions of Meaning for US Institutional Review BoardsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2002
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000