INDUSTRIAL SEGREGATION AND THE GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF FRINGE BENEFITS
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Gender & Society
- Vol. 3 (3) , 388-404
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124389003003007
Abstract
Fringe benefits have been neglected as a source of job-induced gender inequality. Among full-time, private sector workers in the United States in 1979, women's health insurance coverage rate was 12 percentage points lower than men's. This article considers three models to explain such gender differences in the receipt of fringe benefits: the direct discrimination model, the occupational segregation model, and the industrial segregation model. Using data from the May 1979 Current Population Survey Supplement, we found the magnitude of the gender gap in health insurance coverage in the United States to be related to industrial differences. We argue that industrial segregation of women workers may be more important than occupational segregation in determining gender differences in work rewards.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Labor Market, Pension Rule Structure and Retirement Benefit Promise for Long-Term EmployeesSocial Forces, 1986
- Totem or Tyrant? Monopoly, Regional, and Local Sector Effects on Worker CommitmentSocial Forces, 1985
- The Effect of Blue-Collar Unions on White-Collar Wages and Fringe BenefitsILR Review, 1985
- Union Effects on White-Collar CompensationILR Review, 1983
- The Impact of Market Structure on Wages, Fringe Benefits, and TurnoverILR Review, 1983
- The Sexual Segregation of Occupations: Theories of Labor Stratification in IndustryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Defrocking dualism: A new approach to defining industrial sectorsSocial Science Research, 1981
- Bringing the Firms Back in: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of WorkAmerican Sociological Review, 1980
- Industry Marginality and Female Employment: A New AppraisalAmerican Sociological Review, 1980
- The Impact of Private Pensions on Firm AttachmentThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979