Embodied Conversational Agents
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Social Psychology
- Vol. 40 (1) , 26-36
- https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.1.26
Abstract
It was analyzed whether an embodied conversational agent (ECA) has specific advantages when employed with privacy invading technologies such as a biometric security system. The study compares the effects of an ECA interface with the effects of conventional text-based and voice-based interfaces on user acceptance and usability. An additional variable was whether the biometric system falsely rejected the user twice or whether it directly accepted him/her. Results of the 2 × 3 between-subjects design indicated that, although overall the text interface is rated most positive, voice and ECA yield distinct social effects: They have more advantageous consequences when problems arise – i.e., when the user is rejected repeatedly. The implications for social psychology in terms of applicability of new research methods as well as insights concerning fundamental research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Social Robotics” und Mensch-Maschine-InteraktionZeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 2006
- Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interactionNeuropsychologia, 2005
- Shallow and Inner Forms of Emotional Intelligence in Advisory Dialog SimulationPublished by Springer Nature ,2004
- Social Inhibition in Immersive Virtual EnvironmentsPRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 2003
- TARGET ARTICLE: Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social PsychologyPsychological Inquiry, 2002
- Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual EnvironmentsPRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 2001
- External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interfaceCommunications of the ACM, 2000
- Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to ComputersJournal of Social Issues, 2000
- Cooperating with life-like interface agentsComputers in Human Behavior, 1999
- When the Interface Is a FaceHuman–Computer Interaction, 1996