Soil-sampling errors and advisory analyses
- 1 June 1955
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 46 (1) , 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600039563
Abstract
1. Twenty-four sampling units from 50 fields of differing soil type and past manurial history have been examined separately for pH and 1% citric soluble phosphorus and potassium to determine the errors which can occur in obtaining a representative sample for analysis.2. Soils which had received lime and fertilizers within 3 years of the sampling date showed appreciably greater sampling errors than those which had not.3. The sampling errors were greater than the analytical errors and were such that the common practice of classifying soils into six fertility groups was not justified. Three major groups are more reasonable and practical for routine advisory purposes.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- PRINCIPLES OF SOIL SAMPLINGSoil Science, 1944
- Rapid Determination of Soluble Nutrients in Soil and Plant Extracts by Means of Photelectric ColorimeterIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition, 1943
- Untersuchungen über die zweckmäßigste Art der Probenahme für chemische BodenkontrolleBodenkunde und Pflanzenernährung, 1943
- Transactions and communicationsJournal of the Society of Chemical Industry, 1933
- THE DETERMINATION OF POTASSIUM IN BLOOD SERUMJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1930
- Improvements in the deniges colorimetric method for phosphorus and arsenicIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition, 1929
- On the Probable Error of Sampling in Soil SurveysThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1915
- LXXXIX.—The sampling of solisJournal of the Chemical Society, Transactions, 1902