Are We Getting Informed Consent from Patients with Cancer?
Open Access
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Vol. 83 (7) , 439-443
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689008300710
Abstract
We developed a consent form for a hypothetical trial and asked patients to underline information that was pertinent to their decision to accept or refuse to participate in the proposed trial. We also investigated whether patients correctly interpreted statements describing the probability of certain events occurring. Of the 50 patients, 74% did not indicate that both risks and benefits were pertinent. Of the 20 patients who would not enter the trial, 70% focused on risks of therapy only. In contrast, of the 30 who agreed to enter, only 33% focused entirely on risks, while 10% did not note potential for either benefit or risk. For each of four probability statements, patients chose one of four possible interpretations, only one of which was correct. Depending on the statement, between 26 and 54% of the interpretations were incorrect. It appears that many decisions regarding trial entry may be based upon incomplete or incorrect information.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Timed magnitude comparisons of numerical and nonnumerical expressions of uncertaintyMemory & Cognition, 1989
- American College of Physicians Ethics ManualAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984
- Informed consent and patient decision making: Two decades of researchSocial Science & Medicine, 1983
- Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.1983
- Autonomy & the Refusal of Lifesaving TreatmentHastings Center Report, 1981
- Informed ConsentAnnual Review of Medicine, 1978