Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Mammography, and Clinical Breast Examination
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 292 (11) , 1317-1325
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.11.1317
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Mammography, and Clinical Breast Examination — ContextCurrent recommendations for women who have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are to undergo breast surveillance from age 25 years onward with mammography annually and clinical breast examination (CBE) every 6 months; however, many tumors are detected at a relatively advanced stage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound may improve the ability to detect breast cancer at an early stage.ObjectiveTo compare the sensitivity and specificity of 4 methods of breast cancer surveillance (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and CBE) in women with hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer due to a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA surveillance study of 236 Canadian women aged 25 to 65 years with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who underwent 1 to 3 annual screening examinations, consisting of MRI, mammography, and ultrasound at a single tertiary care teaching hospital between November 3, 1997, and March 31, 2003. On the day of imaging and at 6-month intervals, CBE was performed.Main Outcome MeasuresSensitivity and specificity of each of the 4 surveillance modalities, and sensitivity of all 4 screening modalities vs mammography and CBE.ResultsEach imaging modality was read independently by a radiologist and scored on a 5-point Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System scale. All lesions with a score of 4 or 5 (suspicious or highly suspicious for malignancy) were biopsied. There were 22 cancers detected (16 invasive and 6 ductal carcinoma in situ). Of these, 17 (77%) were detected by MRI vs 8 (36%) by mammography, 7 (33%) by ultrasound, and 2 (9.1%) by CBE. The sensitivity and specificity (based on biopsy rates) were 77% and 95.4% for MRI, 36% and 99.8% for mammography, 33% and 96% for ultrasound, and 9.1% and 99.3% for CBE, respectively. There was 1 interval cancer. All 4 screening modalities combined had a sensitivity of 95% vs 45% for mammography and CBE combined.ConclusionsIn BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, MRI is more sensitive for detecting breast cancers than mammography, ultrasound, or CBE alone. Whether surveillance regimens that include MRI will reduce mortality from breast cancer in high-risk women requires further investigation.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- MRI Screening for Breast Cancer in Women with a Familial or Genetic PredispositionImaging Decisions MRI, 2005
- MRI of Occult Breast Carcinoma in a High-Risk PopulationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and stagingRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2002
- Comparison of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mammography, and Ultrasound for Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Hereditary Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography in Women With a Hereditary Risk of Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging.Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2000
- Breast MR Imaging Screening in 192 Women Proved or Suspected to Be Carriers of a Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene: Preliminary ResultsRadiology, 2000
- Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer FamiliesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies ConsortiumPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- MR imaging of the breast.Radiology, 1995