Observations on the Interpretation of Schick Tests
Open Access
- 1 November 1936
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 31 (5) , 387-399
- https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.31.5.387
Abstract
Summary: Licensed (U. S.) Schick-products of different manufacturers give inconsistent results. Of the 87 individuals Schick-tested each with 6 different products, 30 (34 per cent) showed inconsistencies and 23 (26 per cent) showed frank disagreement in the readings. Reactions to the toxins of the Schick-outfits were remarkably constistent with the exception of one product. Errors in interpreting the “Schick-immunity” were usually due to the inconsistent reactions ensuing upon the Schick-control. False interpretations of the Schick-test are most frequently made in the group of persons skin sensitive to diphtheria-protein. Products containing dilute toxoid as a Schick-control were the only ones which resulted in no errors of interpretation of the “Schick-immunity” of the persons tested. All products using heated toxin as a control gave some false results. Our findings substantiate the fact that the antitoxin-level of “Schick-immunity” lies between 1/500 and 1/250 of a unit of antitoxin, when the Schick-test-material conforms to the standard recommended by the League of Nations.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: