An adequate theory for the shear strength of reinforced concrete structures
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Thomas Telford Ltd. in Magazine of Concrete Research
- Vol. 60 (9) , 635-650
- https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2008.60.9.635
Abstract
Traditional shear design procedures for concrete structures rely on empirical equations derived from laboratory experiments and lack the type of adequate theory that forms the basis of flexural design. As shear resistance depends on so many variables and because laboratory tests do not cover the full practical range of parameters, empirical shear design equations can result in structures with inadequate shear strength. Recent failures of such structures have highlighted the need for shear design provisions solidly based on an adequate theory. This paper introduces such a theory and explains the simple design models derived from the theory, which include a strut-and-tie model for disturbed regions and a sectional model for flexural regions. These models form the basis of the shear provisions on the 2004 Canadian standard for the design of concrete structures. In the current paper, results from nine major experimental series are compared with predictions from the new shear provisions and with predictions from the shear provisions of the Eurocode and the American Concrete Institute code. It is demonstrated that the new shear design provisions are capable of predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete members and prestressed concrete members with considerably greater reliability.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of the 2004 Canadian Standards Association (CSA) A23.3 shear provisions for reinforced concreteCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2006
- Neues, vorteilhaftes Verbundmittel für Stahlverbund‐Tragwerke mit hoher Dauerfestigkeit.Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, 1987
- Fundamental Analysis of Aggregate InterlockJournal of the Structural Division, 1981
- Towards a Rational Theory for RC Members in ShearJournal of the Structural Division, 1978