Rational Participation: The Politics of Relative Power
- 1 July 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 10 (3) , 273-292
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400002209
Abstract
Survey researchers have been reporting, for two decades or more, that a citizen's decision to participate in politics is most strongly influenced by his subjective sense of efficacy. Those who feel able to make a great impact tend to participate vigorously, while those who feel impotent tend to withdraw. According to the conventional wisdom all this is mostly inside one's head, with few objective – much less rational – referents. For example, social psychologists, and political researchers under their spell, see subjective efficacy as a mere reflection of ‘ego strength’. The more sociologically-inclined see psycho-cultural values (such as ‘civic orientation’) producing a sense of efficacy which, once again, bears little relationship to one's real influence.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Judging of Nations: Some comments on the assessment of regimes in the New StatesEuropean Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Democracy and Social Inequality: A ReanalysisAmerican Sociological Review, 1977
- Boudon, education and the theory of gamesSocial Science Information, 1976
- Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Social ConflictBritish Journal of Political Science, 1975
- Why do high income people participate more in politics?Public Choice, 1971
- Games of statusBehavioral Science, 1971
- An introduction to the theory of political participationSocial Science Information, 1970
- Inequality: A Cross-National AnalysisAmerican Sociological Review, 1967
- The Child'S Acquisition of Regime Norms: Political EfficacyAmerican Political Science Review, 1967
- The Mobilization of the Periphery: Data on Turnout, Party Membership and Candidate Recruitment in NorwayActa Sociologica, 1962