How to Subvert Democracy: Montesions in Peru
Preprint
- 1 May 2004
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Which of the democratic checks and balances - opposition parties, the judiciary, a free press - is the most forceful? Peru has the full set of democratic institutions. In the 1990s, the secret-police chief Montesinos systematically undermined them all with bribes. We quantify the checks using the bribe prices. Montesinos paid a television-channel owner about 100 times what he paid a judge or a politician. One single television channel's bribe was five times larger than the total of the opposition politicians' bribes. By revealed preference, the strongest check on the government's power was the news media.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government AccountabilityAmerican Economic Review, 2006
- The new comparative economicsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Who Owns the Media?The Journal of Law and Economics, 2003
- A free press is bad news for corruptionJournal of Public Economics, 2003
- Elections Without Democracy: Thinking About Hybrid RegimesJournal of Democracy, 2002
- Press Freedom, Human Capital and CorruptionSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Cashing in on Authoritarianism: Media Collusion in Fujimori’s PeruThe International Journal of Press/Politics, 2002
- High Anxiety in the Andes: Peru's Decade of Living DangerouslyJournal of Democracy, 2001
- Buying SupermajoritiesAmerican Political Science Review, 1996
- The FederalistPublished by Harvard University Press ,1961