Factors Associated with the Selection of Mutations Conferring Resistance to Protease Inhibitors (PIs) in PI-Experienced Patients Displaying Treatment Failure on Darunavir
Open Access
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 52 (2) , 491-496
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00909-07
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize the mutations selected by darunavir (DRV) use in protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients and the associated factors. We analyzed treatment failure in 54 PI-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients on a DRV- and ritonavir-containing regimen. Viral genotyping was carried out at the baseline, at between 1 and 3 months of treatment, and at between 3 and 6 months of treatment to search for the selection of mutations conferring resistance to PIs. The median baseline HIV RNA level was 4.9 log 10 copies/ml, and the median CD4 count was 87 cells/mm 3 . At the baseline, the median numbers of resistance mutations were as follows: 3 DRV resistance mutations, 4 major PI resistance mutations, and 10 minor PI resistance mutations. The most common mutations that emerged at rebound included V32I (44%), I54M/L (24%), L33F (25%), I84V (21%), and L89V (12%). Multivariate analysis showed that higher baseline HIV RNA levels and smaller numbers of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor simultaneously used with DRV were associated with a higher risk of DRV resistance mutation selection. By contrast, L76V, a known DRV resistance mutation, was found to decrease the risk of selection of another DRV resistance mutation. The occurrence of virological failure while a patient was on DRV was associated with the selection of mutations that increased the level of DRV resistance without affecting susceptibility to tipranavir (TPV). In these PI-treated patients who displayed treatment failure while they were on a DRV-containing regimen, we confirmed the set of emerging mutations associated with DRV failure and identified the factors associated with the selection of these mutations. TPV susceptibility does not seem to be affected by the selection of a DRV resistance mutation.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Week 24 efficacy and safety of TMC114/ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV patientsAIDS, 2007
- Identification and Structural Characterization of I84C and I84A Mutations That Are Associated with High-Level Resistance to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitors and Impair Viral ReplicationAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Genotypic predictors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistanceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Genotypic Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Associated with Reduced Susceptibility and Virologic Response to the Protease Inhibitor TipranavirJournal of Virology, 2006
- Personalised social care for adults with disabilities: a problematic concept for frontline practiceHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2006
- Resistance profiles observed in virological failures after 24 weeks of amprenavir/ritonavir containing regimen in protease inhibitor experienced patientsJournal of Medical Virology, 2004
- Emergence of Resistance to Protease Inhibitor Amprenavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Patients: Selection of Four Alternative Viral Protease Genotypes and Influence of Viral Susceptibility to Coadministered Reverse Transcriptase Nucleoside InhibitorsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Loss of antiretroviral drug susceptibility at low viral load during early virological failure in treatment-experienced patientsAIDS, 2000
- In Vivo Resistance to a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Proteinase Inhibitor: Mutations, Kinetics, and FrequenciesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- In vivo emergence of HIV-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitorsNature, 1995