A Biomechanical Evaluation of Two Methods of Manual Load Lifting
- 1 June 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in A I I E Transactions
- Vol. 6 (2) , 105-113
- https://doi.org/10.1080/05695557408974941
Abstract
Since the middle 1930's it has been advocated that all lifting should be carried out with the back near vertical and with the knees bent. The basis for this recommendation has been that it shifts the stresses on the body from the low-back to the legs. Under certain conditions this recommendation is invalid. In this paper Chaffin and Baker's biomechanical lifting model is extended by considering the erector spinae muscles and by considering load accelerations. Mathematical modeling shows that forces on the erector spinae muscles and the lumbosacral disc can be as much as 50% higher when using the recommended “straight back, bent knees” method when compared to the common “stooped back” method. The straight back method is recommended only for lifts when the object is initially close to the spine.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Biomechanical Model for Analysis of Symmetric Sagittal Plane LiftingA I I E Transactions, 1970
- Determination of Body Segment ParametersHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1963
- Role of the Trunk in Stability of the SpineJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1961
- THE ROLE OF ABDOMINAL PRESSURE IN RELIEVING THE PRESSURE ON THE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCSThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1957
- ROENTGENOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION OF THE LUMBOSACRAL SPINE IN ROUTINE PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMINATIONSJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1954