Herb–Drug Interactions in Oncology: Focus on Mechanisms of Induction
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 11 (7) , 742-752
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.11-7-742
Abstract
Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Describe the possible pharmacokinetic interactions between complementary alternative medicines and oncolytic drugs and the clinical consequences thereof.Define the role of the nuclear receptors PXR, CAR, and VDR in herb–drug interactions.Discuss methods to measure induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ at CME.TheOncologist.com An increasing number of cancer patients are using complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in combination with their conventional chemotherapeutic treatment. Considering the narrow therapeutic window of oncolytic drugs, this CAM use increases the risk of clinically relevant herb–anticancer drug interactions. Such a relevant interaction is that of St. John's wort with the anticancer drugs irinotecan and imatinib. It is, however, estimated that CAM–anticancer drug interactions are responsible for substantially more unexpected toxicities of chemotherapeutic drugs and possible undertreatment seen in cancer patients. Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes and ATP-binding cassette drug transporters can be one of the mechanisms behind CAM–anticancer drug interactions. Induction will often lead to therapeutic failure because of lower plasma levels of the anticancer drugs, and will easily go unrecognized in cancer treatment, where therapeutic failure is common. Recently identified nuclear receptors, such as the pregnane X receptor, the constitutive androstane receptor, and the vitamin D-binding receptor, play an important role in the induction of metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. This knowledge has already been an aid in the identification of some CAM probably capable of causing interactions with anticancer drugs: kava-kava, vitamin E, quercetin, ginseng, garlic, β-carotene, and echinacea. Evidently, more research is necessary to prevent therapeutic failure and toxicity in cancer patients and to establish guidelines for CAM use.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine During Cancer Treatment: Beyond InnocenceThe Oncologist, 2006
- Genetic Polymorphisms of Drug-Metabolising Enzymes and Drug Transporters in the Chemotherapeutic Treatment of CancerClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2006
- Herb-Drug InteractionsDrugs, 2005
- Potential of chemotherapy?herb interactions in adult cancer patientsSupportive Care in Cancer, 2004
- Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Drugs with St John’s WortJournal of Psychopharmacology, 2004
- Herbal Interactions Involving Cytochrome P450 EnzymesToxicological Reviews, 2004
- Guggulsterone antagonizes farnesoid X receptor induction of bile salt export pump but activates pregnane X receptor to inhibit cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase geneBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2003
- Effect of Silybin and its congeners on human liver microsomal cytochrome P450 activitiesPhytotherapy Research, 2002
- Identification of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of human N-acetyltransferase genes NAT1, NAT2, AANAT, ARD1, and L1CAM in the Japanese populationJournal of Human Genetics, 2001
- The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptorsPublished by Elsevier ,1995