Infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Study of the Treatment of One Hundred and Six Infections*
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 78 (4) , 512-23
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199604000-00005
Abstract
We evaluated the results of treatment for ninety-seven patients (106 infections in ninety-eight hips) who had had either an infection after a total hip arthroplasty or positive intraoperative cultures of specimens obtained during revision of a total hip arthroplasty for presumed aseptic loosening. The patients were managed according to various protocols on the basis of the clinical setting (positive intraoperative cultures, early postoperative infection, late chronic infection, or acute hematogenous infection). Aerobic gram-positive cocci accounted for 109 (74 per cent) of the 147 microbial isolates; gram-negative bacilli, for twenty-one (14 per cent); and anaerobes, for twelve (8 per cent). The white blood-cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were elevated in association with seventeen (16 per cent) and sixty-seven (63 per cent) of the 106 infections, respectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 0.3 to eleven years). A good result was noted after the initial treatment of twenty-eight (90 per cent) of the thirty-one infections that had been diagnosed on the basis of positive intraoperative cultures at the time of the revision, twenty-five (71 per cent) of the thirty-five early postoperative infections, twenty-nine (85 per cent) of the thirty-four late chronic infections, and three of the six acute hematogenous infections. Of the twenty++-one infections for which the initial therapy failed, twelve eventually were eradicated after additional treatment and the hip had a functional prosthesis at the time of follow-up. Of the ninety-seven infections that were treated successfully (there was a functional retained or exchange prosthesis in place at the time of the most recent follow-up and infection had not recurred at least two years after the discontinuation of antibiotic therapy), nine were associated with subsequent aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. The factors associated with recurrent infection were retained bone cement, the number of previous operations, potential immunocompromise, and early postoperative infection after arthroplasty without cement.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hip arthroplasty infection: Current conceptsActa Orthopaedica, 1990
- Deep infection of cemented total hip arthroplasties caused by coagulase-negative staphylococciThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1989
- Deep infection in Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Comparison of plain and gentamicin-loaded cementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1987
- Clinical and microbial features of prosthetic joint infectionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Infection after total hip replacement. With special reference to a discharge from the woundThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1983
- The results of reinsertion of a total hip prosthesis after sepsisThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1979
- The results of the pseudarthrosis after removal of an infected total hip prosthesisThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1977
- The natural history of the patient with an infected total hip replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1977
- Postoperative infection in total prosthetic replacement arthroplasty of the hip-joint with special reference to the bacterial content of the air of the operating roomBritish Journal of Surgery, 1969
- Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip after Dislocation and Acetabular FracturesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1969