The politics and pitfalls of reducing waste in the military
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Defence Economics
- Vol. 1 (2) , 129-139
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10430719008404656
Abstract
The political influence of the “military‐industrial complex” is responsible for procurement procedures and policies that are privately profitable but socially wasteful. Unfortunately, attempts to reduce military waste by reduction of the political influence of the “military‐industrial complex” may be counterproductive. The genuine public‐good benefits resulting from military spending are motivated in large measure by the private benefits this spending provides organized interests. If these private benefits were reduced by political reform in order to reduce military waste, interests organized around non‐military spending would face only public‐interest resistance to their attempts to divert government spending out of the military and into their special‐interest programs. The result could easily be less waste in the military but greater waste overall, as the composition of government spending becomes more distorted toward special‐interest programs.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complementarity, free riding, and the military expenditures of NATO alliesJournal of Public Economics, 1984
- Revenue Seeking: A Generalization of the Theory of TariffsJournal of Political Economy, 1980
- Why The Government Budget Is Too Small in a DemocracyWorld Politics, 1960
- The Calculus of ConsentPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1960
- Problems of Majority VotingJournal of Political Economy, 1959
- The General Theory of Second BestThe Review of Economic Studies, 1956