Collection devices influence the constituents of exhaled breath condensate: Fig. 1—
Open Access
- 28 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by European Respiratory Society (ERS) in European Respiratory Journal
- Vol. 30 (4) , 807-808
- https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080207
Abstract
The recent paper by Rosias et al. 1 reported that silicone and glass inner coatings were superior to the EcoScreen® system (Erich Jaeger GmbH, Hochberg, Germany), aluminium, polypropylene and Teflon when measuring 8-isoprostane and albumin levels in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) 1–3. This raises important issues in the ongoing debate about the optimal collection method for sampling airway biomarkers. We have complemented these important data by comparing the efficiency and reproducibility of EBC biomarkers collected by different devices in six healthy subjects.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Biomarkers in Exhaled Breath Condensate and Bronchoalveolar LavageAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Breath condenser coatings affect measurement of biomarkers in exhaled breath condensateEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2006
- Relationship between Exhaled Breath Condensate Volume and Measurements of Lung VolumesRespiration, 2006
- Exhaled breath condensate: a space odessey, where no one has gone before…European Respiratory Journal, 2004
- Myopathological features in skeletal muscle of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2003
- Effects of reducing reagents and temperature on conversion of nitrite and nitrate to nitric oxide and detection of NO by chemiluminescenceClinical Chemistry, 1997