Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Prevention of HIV Infection in Women: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Open Access
- 25 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Clinical Trials
- Vol. 2 (5) , e27
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020027
Abstract
The objective of this trial was to investigate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of a daily dose of 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus placebo in preventing HIV infection in women. This was a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The study was conducted between June 2004 and March 2006 in Tema, Ghana; Douala, Cameroon; and Ibadan, Nigeria. We enrolled 936 HIV-negative women at high risk of HIV infection into this study. Participants were randomized 1:1 to once daily use of 300 mg of TDF or placebo. The primary safety endpoints were grade 2 or higher serum creatinine elevations (>2.0 mg/dl) for renal function, grade 3 or 4 aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase elevations (>170 U/l) for hepatic function, and grade 3 or 4 phosphorus abnormalities (<1.5 mg/dl). The effectiveness endpoint was infection with HIV-1 or HIV-2. Study participants contributed 428 person-years of laboratory testing to the primary safety analysis. No significant differences emerged between treatment groups in clinical or laboratory safety outcomes. Study participants contributed 476 person-years of HIV testing to the primary effectiveness analysis, during which time eight seroconversions occurred. Two were diagnosed in participants randomized to TDF (0.86 per 100 person-years) and six in participants receiving placebo (2.48 per 100 person-years), yielding a rate ratio of 0.35 (95% confidence interval = 0.03–1.93), which did not achieve statistical significance. Owing to premature closures of the Cameroon and Nigeria study sites, the planned person-years of follow-up and study power could not be achieved. Daily oral use of TDF in HIV-uninfected women was not associated with increased clinical or laboratory adverse events. Effectiveness could not be conclusively evaluated because of the small number of HIV infections observed during the study. ClnicalTrials.gov NCT00122486Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antiretroviral post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for occupational HIV exposureCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007
- HIV/AIDS: Antiretroviral Therapy for Hepatitis B Virus–HIV–Coinfected Patients: Promises and PitfallsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Seroconversion Following Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis against HIVClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Use of postexposure prophylaxis against HIV infection following sexual exposure does not lead to increases in high-risk behaviorAIDS, 2004
- Tenofovir Disoproxil FumarateClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Rapid hepatitis B virus-DNA decay in co-infected HIV–hepatitis B virus ‘e-minus’ patients with YMDD mutations after 4 weeks of tenofovir therapyAIDS, 2003
- Two Low Doses of Tenofovir Protect Newborn Macaques against Oral Simian Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- In vitro Selection and Characterization of HIV-1 with Reduced Susceptibility to PMPAAntiviral Therapy, 1999
- A Case–Control Study of HIV Seroconversion in Health Care Workers after Percutaneous ExposureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Antiviral activity of phosphonylmethoxyalkyl derivatives of purine and pyrimidinesAntiviral Research, 1987