Explaining Variation in the Enterprise Response to Industrial Relations Legislation: The Case of the Safety Representative Regulations
- 1 February 1981
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Personnel Review
- Vol. 10 (2) , 11-15
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb055431
Abstract
A much quoted observation of Phelps Brown in the late 1950s was that “when British industrial relations are compared with those of the other democracies they stand out because they are so little regulated by law”. However, the position has changed so substantially since then that Lewis was able to comment that “in 1975 it would seem that the one indubitably fundamental and irreversible trend is the ever‐increasing extent of the legal regulation of the British system of industrial relations”. In view of this substantially changed state of affairs a fundamental task for industrial relations researchers to undertake is that of explaining variation in the impact of industrial relations legislation at the level of the individual employment establishment.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personnel Management in the Management HierarchyManagement Decision, 1980
- An Analysis of the Problem of Industrial Accidents in BritainInternational Journal of Manpower, 1980
- Safety Representatives, Industrial Relations and Hard TimesIndustrial Law Journal, 1977
- THE MEASUREMENT OF TRADE UNION BARGAINING POWERBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1977
- A power analysis of workplace labour relations1Industrial Relations Journal, 1976