Is routine antenatal booking vaginal examination necessary for reasons other than cervical cytology if ultrasound examination is planned?
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 95 (6) , 556-559
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb09482.x
Abstract
Sixteen ovarian cysts, including one borderline ovarian malignancy, and ten trichomonal vaginal discharges but no cases of cervical incompetence or ectopic pregnancy had been detected at booking vaginal examination in 11,622 consecutive antenatal case records abstracted retrospectively. In an attitude survey of pregnant women 77% believed that vagnial examination was reassuring, 55% found it unpleasant, and 18% thought it could cause miscarriage. This, and a review of the literature, suggests that routine vaginal examination if ultrasound is planned has few advantages beyond the taking of a cervical smear.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- OVARIAN CYSTS IN PREGNANCY - DOES ULTRASOUND MAKE TRADITIONAL MANAGEMENT INAPPROPRIATE1987
- Ultrasound study of ovarian cysts in pregnancy: prevalence and significanceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986
- Precocious Cervical Ripening and Preterm LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 1986
- A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1984
- Pelvic Examination: Patient Safety and ComfortJOGN Nursing, 1981
- CERVICAL-CARCINOMA IN PREGNANCY1981
- Patientsʼ Attitudes toward Gynecologic Examination and to GynecologistsMedical Care, 1977