Diagnostic Strategies to Detect Glucose Intolerance in a Multiethnic Population
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 26 (2) , 290-296
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2.290
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Identifying individuals who have elevated glucose concentrations is important for clinicians so that preventive strategies can be invoked, and it is useful for researchers who study associations between elevated glucose and adverse health outcomes. These methods should be applicable worldwide across different ethnic groups. Therefore, the objective of our analysis was to determine whether using the fasting glucose and HbA1c together could improve the classification of individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes in a multiethnic cohort randomly assembled in Canada. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We determined the optimum diagnostic criteria to identify people with abnormal glucose tolerance using fasting plasma glucose, 2-h post-glucose load plasma glucose, and HbA1c in 936 Canadians of South Asian, Chinese, and European descent. RESULTS—The sensitivity of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria to diagnose diabetes compared with the World Health Organization definitions was poor at 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.7–61.0). Using a receiver operator characteristic curve, the optimum combined cut-point using fasting glucose and HbA1c to diagnose diabetes was a fasting glucose ≥5.7 mmol/l and an HbA1c ≥5.9%. These cut-points were associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 71.7% (60.3–83.1) and 95.0% (93.5–96.4), respectively, a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 14.3 (9.6–19.0), and a negative LR of 0.3 (0.2–0.4). Significant ethnic variation in the sensitivity and specificity of this approach was observed: 47.4% (24.9–69.8) and 97.6% (95.9–99.4) among Europeans, 78.6% (57.1–100) and 95.9% (93.6–98.2) among Chinese, and 85.2% (71.8–98.6) and 91.3% (88.1–94.6) among South Asians, respectively. Participants with impaired glucose tolerance could not be identified reliably using the fasting glucose or HbA1c alone or in combination. CONCLUSIONS—The sensitivity of the ADA criteria to diagnose diabetes is low, and there is substantial variation between ethnic groups. Fasting glucose and HbA1c may be used together to improve the identification of individuals who have diabetes, allowing clinicians to streamline the use of the oral glucose tolerance test.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of ADA 1997 and WHO 1985 criteria for diabetes in south Indians – the Chennai Urban Population StudyDiabetic Medicine, 2000
- Is glucose a continuous risk factor for cardiovascular mortality?Diabetes Care, 1999
- Impact of new diagnostic criteria for diabetes on different populations.Diabetes Care, 1999
- The relationship between glucose and incident cardiovascular events. A metaregression analysis of published data from 20 studies of 95,783 individuals followed for 12.4 years.Diabetes Care, 1999
- Diabetes in older adults: comparison of 1997 American Diabetes Association classification of diabetes mellitus with 1985 WHO classificationThe Lancet, 1998
- A clinical approach for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: an analysis using glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Meta-analysis Research Group on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Using Glycated Hemoglobin LevelsJAMA, 1996
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- Automated quantitative microcolumn chromatography of haemoglobin A2Biomedical Chromatography, 1991
- Glycosylated HaemoglobinDiabetic Medicine, 1985
- Glycosylated HaemoglobinDiabetic Medicine, 1985