Suboptimal growth with hyper-accurate ribosomes
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archiv für Mikrobiologie
- Vol. 144 (1) , 96-101
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00454963
Abstract
Mutant bacteria with hyperaccurate ribosomes support their excessive accuracy of translation in vitro by dissipating 1.5 to 2.5 cognate ternary complexes per peptide bond formed. This is to be compared with a dissipation rate close to 1.1 for wild-type ribosomes. Here, we have tested the hypothesis that a corresponding loss of translational efficiency in vivo would lower the growth rate of the mutants. Such a growth inhibitory effect would explain why the lower accuracy of wild-type ribosomes is more fit. Our data show that as expected the μ of the hyperaccurate mutants is smaller than that of wild-type bacteria. In contrast, during glucose-limited growth in chemostats there is not the same simple correlation between growth yield and ribosomal efficiency for the hyperaccurate mutants.This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Translation is a non-uniform processJournal of Molecular Biology, 1984
- Streptomycin preferentially perturbs ribosomal proofreadingMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 1984
- Kinetic impairment of restrictive streptomycin-resistant ribosomesMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 1984
- Costs of accuracy determined by a maximal growth rate constraintQuarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 1984
- Optimization of Translation AccuracyPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- The protein burden oflac operon productsJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1983
- Ram ribosomes are defective proofreadersMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 1983
- Translation of MuLV and MSV RNAs in nuclease-treated reticulocyte extracts: Enhancement of the gag-pol polypeptide with yeast suppressor tRNACell, 1978
- Selective disadvantage of non-functional protein synthesis inEscherichia coliJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1976
- The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing culturesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1965