Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
- 20 May 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 95 (10) , 2395-2400
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.10.2395
Abstract
Background Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (AS) carries an increased risk in the presence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Few data are available on the outcome of such patients. Methods and Results Between 1985 and 1992, 154 consecutive patients (107 men and 47 women) with LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤35%) underwent aortic valve replacement for AS. The mean preoperative characteristics included EF, 27±6%; aortic valve mean gradient, 44±18 mm Hg; aortic valve area, 0.6±0.2 cm 2 ; and cardiac output, 4.1±1.5 L/min. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 78 patients (51%). Perioperative (30-day) mortality was 9% (14 of 154 patients). Fifty patients died during follow-up. Coronary artery disease ( P =.002) and a reduced preoperative cardiac output ( P =.03) were significantly related to reduced overall survival rate by multivariate analysis. Postoperative improvement occurred in most patients; 88% were New York Heart Association class III or IV before surgery versus 7% after surgery. Postoperative EF was assessed in 76% of survivors; 76% of these demonstrated improvement. By multivariate analysis, change in EF was inversely related to coronary disease ( P =.002) and preoperative aortic valve area ( P =.03). Conclusions Despite LV dysfunction, the risk of aortic valve replacement for AS was acceptable and related to coronary artery disease and mean aortic gradient, and long-term survival was related to coronary disease and cardiac output. Improvement in symptoms and EF occurred in most patients.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Determinants of survival and recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacementThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- Subjective visual echocardiographic estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction as an alternative to conventional echocardiographic methods: Comparison with contrast angiographyClinical Cardiology, 1991
- Superiority of visual versus computerized echocardiographic estimation of radionuclide left ventricular ejection fractionAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: Prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Coronary artery disease and its management: Influence on survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacementJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction by visual estimation during real-time two-dimensional echocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Two-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: Prospective analysis of what constitutes an adequate determinationAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Early valve replacement for preservation of ventricular function?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Aortic StenosisCirculation, 1968