The Effect of Number of Categories in Rating Scales on Precision of Estimation of Scale Values
- 1 December 1973
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 38 (4) , 513-532
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291492
Abstract
The precision of scale value estimates using maximum likelihood estimation is examined for varying numbers of categories, varying discriminal dispersions and with and without category boundary estimation. It is concluded that this type of estimation is somewhat unsatisfactory if boundaries are estimated unless these are of specific interest. If they are not estimated, it is concluded that using seven or more categories provides very nearly as much precision of estimate as a corresponding continuous judgment task.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Maximum Likelihood Solution for the Method of Successive Intervals Allowing for Unequal Stimulus DispersionsPsychometrika, 1967
- How to Make Meaning More MeaningfulContemporary Psychology, 1958
- The reliability of self-ratings as a function of the amount of verbal anchoring and of the number of categories on the scale.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953
- A Modification of the Method of Successive IntervalsPsychometrika, 1940
- Optimal refinement of the rating scale.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1939
- A Comparative Study of Scales Constructed by Three Psychophysical MethodsPsychometrika, 1937
- On the Loss of Reliability in Ratings Due to Coarseness of the Scale.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1924